‘Cause knowledge is power

March 28, 2007

Not in the best of moods.

Filed under: Uncategorized — ispower @ 7:50 am
Tags: , ,

I just had a little spat with my S.O, I think I was in the wrong, I’m not sure. Got me emotional anyway, so I left the house for an internet cafe.

I was talking in a feminist forum, with a girl talking about a channel called ‘oxygen’ that she likes. We got onto speaking about how the majority of the media is aimed at white men, where we both agreed. She said the majority of action heros are men, and i noted that even when they are women, they’re made into sexual objects.

It exploded from here where she said that these women in movies are just ustilizing their sexuality, and that it’s showing womens sexuality as powerful, ’sex sells’ and men are also sex symbols.

I thought there was a difference between a sex object, and a sex symbol. A sexy man is still a person, in fact, he’s a person first, and then sexy second. Sexy women in movies are there to be sexy first, and to do other things second.

She said that some or most people might see the women as sex objects, but she didn’t so it was okay. I responded that if some or most people see women as sex objects, there’s clearly some problem. In the same post that I responded to, she said this:
“You can be oppressed all you want, but I’m going to enjoy the sexuality that women can exhibit with such powerfulness.”

I can be oppressed if I want to. I can choose oppression. This is something I choose. Okay. Also: I don’t enjoy sexuality. She’s said similar things about me and sex in other threads.

I continued to explain that female characters in movies are characters written by men and that when you’re watching a character on the silver screen, you’re not watching a woman making empowered choices, you’re watching a woman fill a role that men have created.

She said there’s nothing we can do about it, and I responded that we can get active, boycott things, write letters etc.
I was told that she couldn’t care less about the issue of objectification, and she has other things to fight. Alright, I give her that she’s focusing on other things, but she was also saying that objectification wasn’t a bad thing, and that if it was a bad thing, there’s nothing to be done about it, and how she doesn’t watch shows that make her feel bad anyway, she watches shows with powerful women in them, shows like Sex in the City.

She also talked about how we can change the porn industry not by protesting, but by creating ‘good’ porn. I had a problem with several things in that post, the biggest one being the idea that creating ‘good’ porn will eliminate ‘bad’ porn.
The people who get off on the degredation and humiliation won’t watch this ‘good porn’ and the people who do watch it, are still using a womans body to get off to. I also wouldn’t say ‘Sex in the City’ empowers women.

I was then told this:

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Do you want to know how often I hear this?

Too often!

There’s no substance to what’s being said.

No proof.

Women are objectified every day. So are homosexuals. So are hispanics. So are Native Americans. So are animals!

Do you know who objectified women? Idiots. Do I waste my time changing the opinions of idiots. No! I have better things to do.

I don’t want to change anyone’s opinion. I want them to change it themselves. I want them to wake up with one big bitch-slap on a Tuesday morning. Holding a picket sign may help, but I’ll leave that work to you.

I’m going to watch The Color Purple. And then I’m going to be awed by Frida’s artwork. And then I’m going to have fun with my cobalt blue vibrator. And you want to know why? Because I’m going to enjoy the awesome oragsms that I deserve! icon_pirate.gif

And then I’m going to watch Sex in teh City. ”

I’ve posted her the link to the APA report before, so I’m not happy at being told that there’s no substance to what I’m saying. Is it really that bad for a feminist to say that objectification is bad? Also, another implication that I’m ‘anti-sex.’

I don’t know, I’m complaining about someone else, and that doesn’t feel very ‘big’ of me, but I don’t know. I’ve been insulted a few times now, I’ve been told that the sexism I see in objectification is an unsubstantiated non issue, and that I’m oppressing myself. This is the first time I’ve had such a discussion, and I’m not feeling all that great about it.

On a more positive note. I just discovered this blog

March 21, 2007

More objectification, why don’t men ‘get sexy nekkid’

Filed under: Uncategorized — ispower @ 6:19 am
Tags:

I said this in a conversation to someone else in internet land, but I thought here would be an appropriate place for it. The context is in my specifically talking to someone, and not my talking to the world, but the information provided still stands.

—————-

http://partykillgirl.wordpress.com/

She takes magazines that objectify women, and photoshop them so they look like their about objectifying men. People object to these images, but don’t object to the same content when it’s happening to women? Why?

Also, women are encouraged to shed clothing, where men are not. Men have the choice to do it, they can show skin, and dress promiscuously, but most of the time the don’t. I mean, I just did a google search, and look what i found.

http://www.myspacepranks.com/Myspace-Posters/music-poster-18.jpg
Would you see a man in the same pose, fondling himself sexually, in the front cover of a magazine? (unless it’s like, a homosexual pornographic magazine or something.)

Look at these music posters, the boys are covered up, and not posed to look sexually suggestive but the girls are.
http://www.oneposter.com/UserData/Poster/Poster_15022.jpg
http://www.global-merchandise.com/images/POSTERS/PP0288.jpg
http://www.kylieklub.com/web/MultimediaFiles/TOTALLY_BOYBAND_TOP.JPG
http://www.freewebz.com/spice-lt/logo-of-the-girl-band-legend.jpg

Guys can choose to expose their skin, and pose demurely, but they don’t. Why not? Because it’s objectifying, and therefore degrading.

:<

Hypocrisy, and objectification

Filed under: Uncategorized — ispower @ 6:18 am
Tags:

I got all this information, and such from SparkleMatrix, and the posters over there. Just givin’ credit where it’s due. <3

Jesus Christ.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/4514906.stm

A print of a nude man was taken down at the Mark Jason Gallery, because a group of men voiced objections about the image. It was then replaced with a nude female, which is apparently okay with the protesters.

Reasons given for objecting to the naked man, were that the image was pornographic, and that it ‘would upset women.’

I have a few questions regarding this.

Firstly: If a picture of a naked man is bad, because a naked man is pornography, then why is a picture of a naked female fine?

Is a picture of a naked female pornography? If it is, why is pornography of women allowed and not pornography of men, and if it isn’t, then why is a naked man porn, and a naked woman art? What is with the double standard?

Secondly: Women are funnily enough, people. They have mouths, they have the right to peacefully assemble. If women are upset by something, they can object to it, and protest it all by themselves.
It isn’t a mans duty to protest things ‘women would object to’ because they don’t know what ‘women’ object to. (Or, in this case, they don’t seem to grasp that women are all individuals, and that some women may object, and others may not. Women are different people, with different goals.)

Many women are upset by the sexualization of girls in this culture. In fact, the American Psychological Association (APA) produced a report which links this sexualization to a range of common mental disorders in girls and women, such as eating disroders, depression, and low self esteem.
Source: http://www.apa.org/releases/sexualization.html

If these men are genuinely concerned about things that upset women, why aren’t they protesting the sexualization of girls? I mean, if a naked woman is acceptable in this society, but a naked man is not, doesn’t that sexualize, and objectify women, leading to these mental disorders?

Jesus. The hypocrisy makes me mad.

Blog at WordPress.com.